↳
In-reply-to
»
For implementations, it would be nice if “update twts” always came after the twt they are referring to. So I thought about using this opportunity to mandate append-style feeds. But that’s just me being lazy. Implementations will have to be able to cope with any order, because feeds cannot/should not be trusted. 🫤
⤋ Read More
@movq@www.uninformativ.de I think the order of the lines in a feed don’t matter as long as we can guarantee the order of Twts. Clients should already be ordering by Timestamp anyway.